Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: 17 a reapportionment plan. 1n its May 13 1992 decision, the Florida Supreme Court acknowledged : 11 the same tisnc it is impossible for us to the complete factual anal lysis contenplated by the Voting Rights Act, as interpreted Thornburg Gingles within the time constraints of article 1, sec- tion 16(c Any decision which requires con- stderation facts that arc unavailable in our analy sis will have tc be resolved in subsequent litigation, as explained Iater in this opinion. [FF Constitution- ality Senate foint Resolution 2G Special tionment Session 1992. 597 So. 2d 276. 282 {Fla. 1992).1 The court's holding was specifically "without prejudice: to the right of any protestor qucstion the validity of the plan by filing petition ir this Court alleging how the plan violates the Voting ights at 2 ...
(.png)
